Skip to content

Everyone automates testing. TestMax proves it.

Test assets in minutes, not hours

TestMax starts at the requirement and ends at the evidence. In between, your team stops drafting and starts reviewing.

Book a demo

Human effort per task

15 test cases

  • By hand150 min
  • With TestMax8 min

1 automation script

  • By hand120 min
  • AI coding tool30 min
  • With TestMax8 min

Release: 200 cases + 50 scripts

  • By hand133 hrs
  • With TestMax8.4 hrs

TestMax benchmark model. Results vary by application and team.

What the time savings look like

Human effort per task, by hand and with TestMax. TestMax time is 3 minutes supervising generation plus 5 minutes of review.

faster test case creation
18.75x
15 test cases: 150 min by hand, 8 min with TestMax
faster automation scripts
15x
One script: 120 min by hand, 8 min with TestMax
faster than an AI coding tool
3.75x
One script: 30 min prompting, fixing and verifying, 8 min with TestMax
lower cost per test asset
~93%
94% for test cases, 93% for scripts, at USD 30 an hour

TestMax benchmark model, not client results. Assumes USD 30/hr; 10 min per manual test case; 2 hrs per manual script; 30 min per script with an AI coding tool; TestMax 3 min generation plus 5 min human review, AI usage included. Results vary by application and team; we validate them on your own requirements during a pilot.

Estimate it for your release

Drag to your cycle. Same per-task figures as the benchmark: 9.5 minutes back per test case, 112 per script.

200
50
$30

By hand

133 hrs

With TestMax

8.4 hrs

Back to your team, every cycle

125 hrs$3,747 in labor

Hours saved per cycle = (test cases x 9.5 min + scripts x 112 min) / 60. Multiply by your loaded hourly cost for the labor saving. Benchmark model; results vary.

Start with intent. Test the real application.

Three ideas behind requirement-driven testing, shaped by recurring problems in Mammoth-AI's QA delivery work.

  1. 01

    Start with a testable requirement

    Ambiguous requirements carry gaps into test design and automation. TestMax scores quality and suggests fixes before a single test is written. Improve the input before automating the test.

    Requirement scoring
  2. 02

    Understand the real application

    A user story alone doesn't reveal the full flow. App Scan supplies the actual screens, fields and workflow. If the login says Email Address, not Username, the tests know it.

  3. 03

    Keep the workflow connected

    Separate tools create handoffs. In TestMax, requirement, case, script, run and evidence stay linked, so any result traces back to the line that asked for it.

    Execution and reports

How the approach changes day-to-day testing

Generation effort, language flexibility, execution, maintenance, reuse and fit.

  1. 01

    Generation effort

    Workflow challenge:Prompt-led work means preparing instructions and app context, again and again

    With TestMax:One-click generation from prepared requirements, project context and App Scan

  2. 02

    Language flexibility

    Workflow challenge:Changing language or revising a script means work in a framework or editor

    With TestMax:Convert scripts between five languages, edit via AI chat or code, export for reuse

  3. 03

    Execution and evidence

    Workflow challenge:Separate runners and reporting add setup before anyone sees a result

    With TestMax:Built-in execution, live logs and evidence, in the same workspace

  4. 04

    Maintenance

    Workflow challenge:App changes mean locators and affected automation need review

    With TestMax:Alternative locators and targeted re-scans support self-healing

  5. 05

    Reuse

    Workflow challenge:Existing cases and datasets need remapping between tools

    With TestMax:Import cases, link requirements, use named or uploaded test-data variations

  6. 06

    Enterprise fit

    Workflow challenge:A fixed workflow makes teams bend their process around the tool

    With TestMax:Enterprise customisation aligns TestMax with your QA process, with project access and roles

We own both ends of the chain

Most tools start at the test. TestMax starts at the requirement and ends at the evidence, the two steps auditors care about.

  • One chain, end to end

    Requirement, test, run, evidence. One record, no spreadsheet rebuild before the audit.

    Traceability

  • Open code you own

    Scripts are real code in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java or C#. Export them and keep them.

  • Quality gate first

    Requirements get checked for quality before automation starts, so weak input never becomes weak tests.

  • Built by a QA delivery team

    Mammoth-AI has run enterprise QA for banks, insurers and healthcare since 2018. TestMax productises that work, and 11 accounts already run on it.

  • Certified delivery

    Mammoth-AI is certified to ISO 9001:2015 for quality management and ISO 27001:2022 for information security.

  • System of record for quality

    Requirements, tests and evidence live in one place, so the history of every release stays readable.

    Access and audit

Terms we use

Requirement-driven testing
An approach where every test starts from a written requirement and its acceptance criteria, so each test has a reason to exist and a record of what it proved.
App Scan
TestMax's scan of your live application, used to ground generated tests in real screens, elements and flows. Guided mode lets a tester steer it; Autonomous mode lets AI explore.
Self-healing locators
Fallback locators and page re-scans that let a test find an element again after the UI changes.

Requirement-driven testing FAQ

  • An approach where every test starts from a written requirement and its acceptance criteria, so each test has a clear reason to exist and a record of what it proved.

Keep exploring

TestMaxTestMax

Watch requirements become tests. Live.

Our team walks you through TestMax on a sample project, from a written requirement to an execution report.

Book a demoor email sales@testmax.ai